|
Sl
No.
|
Title
|
||
|
1
|
M/S. DSR STEEL (P) LTD
Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.
Coram: T.S. THAKUR, GYAN SUDHA MISRA Date of Judgement: 01/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
2
|
GENERAL OFFICER
COMMANDING Vs. CBI & ANR.
Coram: B.S. CHAUHAN, SWATANTER KUMAR Date of Judgement: 01/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
3
|
L.K.VENKAT Vs. UNION OF
INDIA & ORS.
Coram: G.S. SINGHVI, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA Date of Judgement: 01/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
4
|
POONAM RANI @ POONAM
Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ANR.
Coram: G.S. SINGHVI, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA Date of Judgement: 01/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
5
|
M.T. ENRICA LEXIE &
ANR. Vs. DORAMMA & ORS.
Coram: R.M. LODHA, H.L. GOKHALE Date of Judgement: 02/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
6
|
ARJUN Vs. STATE OF
MAHARASHTRA
Coram: K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, DIPAK MISRA Date of Judgement: 03/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
7
|
ISHWARDAS ROHANI Vs.
ALOK MISHRA & ORS.
Coram: ALTAMAS KABIR, J. CHELAMESWAR Date of Judgement: 03/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
8
|
SUPER CASSETTS
INDUSTRIES LTD. Vs. MUSIC BROADCAST PVT. LTD.
Coram: ALTAMAS KABIR, SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J. CHELAMESWAR Date of Judgement: 03/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
9
|
TEJAS CONSTRUCTION
& INFRAS.PVT.LTD. Vs. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL SENDHWA & ANR.
Coram: T.S. THAKUR, GYAN SUDHA MISRA Date of Judgement: 04/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
10
|
RASHMI REKHA THATOI
& ANR Vs. STATE OF ORISSA & ORS.
Coram: K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, DIPAK MISRA Date of Judgement: 04/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
11
|
CHAIRMAN &
C.E.OFFICER, NOIDA & ANR. Vs. MANGE RAM SHARMA (D) THR. LRS. & ANR.
Coram: SWATANTER KUMAR, RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI Date of Judgement: 04/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
12
|
MEENAKSHI KHANDELWAL
Vs. SHAILESH KHANDELWAL
Coram: P. SATHASIVAM, J. CHELAMESWAR Date of Judgement: 04/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
13
|
NEEL KUMAR @ ANIL KUMAR
Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
Coram: B.S. CHAUHAN, FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA Date of Judgement: 07/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
14
|
SUPREME COURT BAR
ASSOCIATION & ORS. Vs. B.D. KAUSHIK
Coram: ALTAMAS KABIR, SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR Date of Judgement: 07/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
15
|
SHALEEN KABRA Vs.
SHIWANI KABRA
Coram: D.K. JAIN, ANIL R. DAVE Date of Judgement: 08/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
16
|
KATHI BHARAT VAJSUR
& ANR. Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT
Coram: H.L. DATTU, ANIL R. DAVE Date of Judgement: 08/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
17
|
NARINDERJIT SINGH Vs.
NORTH STAR ESTATE PROMOTERS LTD.
Coram: G.S. SINGHVI, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA Date of Judgement: 08/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
18
|
STATE OF KERALA &
ORS. Vs. M/S. MAR APPRAEM KURI CO.LTD. & ANR.
Coram: S.H. KAPADIA, D.K. JAIN, SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR Date of Judgement: 08/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
19
|
M/S BEST SELLERS
RETAIL(I)P.LTD. Vs. M/S ADITYA BIRLA NUVO LTD.& ORS.
Coram: A.K. PATNAIK, SWATANTER KUMAR Date of Judgement: 08/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
20
|
M/S A.B.N.A.AND ORS.
Vs. MNG.DIR.M/S U.P.S.I.D.C.KANPUR AND ANR.
Coram: A.K. PATNAIK, SWATANTER KUMAR Date of Judgement: 08/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
21
|
PRIYA GUPTA Vs. STATE
OF CHHATTISGARH & ORS.
Coram: A.K. PATNAIK, SWATANTER KUMAR Date of Judgement: 08/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
22
|
JITENDER KUMAR Vs.
STATE OF HARYANA
Coram: A.K. PATNAIK, SWATANTER KUMAR Date of Judgement: 08/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
23
|
NAGESH Vs. STATE OF
KARNATAKA
Coram: A.K. PATNAIK, SWATANTER KUMAR Date of Judgement: 08/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
24
|
SAHADEVAN & ANR.
Vs. STATE OF T.NADU
Coram: A.K. PATNAIK, SWATANTER KUMAR Date of Judgement: 08/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
25
|
ALAGUPANDI @
ALAGUPANDIAN Vs. STATE OF TAMIL NADU
Coram: A.K. PATNAIK, SWATANTER KUMAR Date of Judgement: 08/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
26
|
MUNNA KUMAR UPADHYAYA @
M.UPADHYAYA Vs. STATE OF A.P.TR.PUB.PROSECUTOR.
Coram: A.K. PATNAIK, SWATANTER KUMAR Date of Judgement: 08/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
27
|
BIPROMASZ BIPRON
TRADING SA Vs. BHARAT ELECTRONICS LIMITED(BEL)
Coram: SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR Date of Judgement: 08/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
28
|
AL JAZEERA STEEL
PRODUCTS COMPANY SAOG Vs. MID INDIA POWER & STEEL LTD.
Coram: SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR Date of Judgement: 08/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
29
|
CHHANGA SINGH &
ANR. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Coram: B.S. CHAUHAN, JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR Date of Judgement: 08/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
30
|
SINNAMANI & ANR.
Vs. G. VETTIVEL & ORS.
Coram: K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, DIPAK MISRA Date of Judgement: 09/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
31
|
COMMON CAUSE Vs. UNION
OF INDIA & ORS.
Coram: B.S. CHAUHAN, JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR Date of Judgement: 10/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
32
|
CHUNDA MURMU Vs. STATE
OF WEST BENGAL
Coram: SWATANTER KUMAR, RANJAN GOGOI Date of Judgement: 10/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
33
|
SALIM GULAB PATHAN Vs.
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA TR.S.H.O.
Coram: SWATANTER KUMAR, RANJAN GOGOI Date of Judgement: 10/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
34
|
ABDUL NAWAZ Vs. STATE
OF WEST BENGAL
Coram: T.S. THAKUR, GYAN SUDHA MISRA Date of Judgement: 10/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
35
|
PARA SEENAIAH &
ANR. Vs. STATE OF A.P. & ANR.
Coram: T.S. THAKUR, GYAN SUDHA MISRA Date of Judgement: 10/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
36
|
MRUDUL M DAMLE & ANR
Vs. C.B.I.,NEW DELHI
Coram: T.S. THAKUR, GYAN SUDHA MISRA Date of Judgement: 10/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
37
|
M/S NARNE CONSTRUCTION
P.LTD.ETC.ETC. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.ETC.
Coram: T.S. THAKUR, GYAN SUDHA MISRA Date of Judgement: 10/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
38
|
ARUNA RODRIGUES &
ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Coram: S.H. KAPADIA, A.K. PATNAIK, SWATANTER KUMAR Date of Judgement: 10/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
39
|
ATMARAM & ORS. Vs.
STATE OF M.P.
Coram: SWATANTER KUMAR, RANJAN GOGOI Date of Judgement: 10/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
40
|
RAJESH BHATNAGAR Vs.
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Coram: SWATANTER KUMAR, RANJAN GOGOI Date of Judgement: 10/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
41
|
SANDEEP Vs. STATE OF
U.P.
Coram: B.S. CHAUHAN, FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA Date of Judgement: 11/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
42
|
MAHARASHTRA STATE BOARD
OF WAKFS Vs. SHAIKH YUSUF BHAI CHAWLA & ORS.
Coram: ALTAMAS KABIR, J. CHELAMESWAR, RANJAN GOGOI Date of Judgement: 11/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
43
|
CHANDRA KUMAR CHOPRA
Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Coram: P. SATHASIVAM, DIPAK MISRA Date of Judgement: 11/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
44
|
SAMAJ PARIVARTANA
SAMUDAYA & ORS. Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.
Coram: , AFTAB ALAM, SWATANTER KUMAR Date of Judgement: 11/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
45
|
M/S PATEL ENGINNERING
LTD. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
Coram: ALTAMAS KABIR, J. CHELAMESWAR Date of Judgement: 11/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
46
|
REGISTRAR GENERAL,PATNA
HIGH COURT Vs. PANDEY GAJENDRA PRASAD & ORS.
Coram: D.K. JAIN, ANIL R. DAVE Date of Judgement: 11/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
47
|
CESC LTD. Vs. CHIEF
POST MASTER GENERAL & ORS.
Coram: R.M. LODHA, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA Date of Judgement: 11/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
48
|
UNION TERRITORY OF
LAKSHADWEEP & ORS. Vs. SEASHELLS BEACH RESORT & ORS.
Coram: T.S. THAKUR, GYAN SUDHA MISRA Date of Judgement: 11/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
49
|
STATE OF M.P. Vs.
RAKESH KOHLI & ANR.
Coram: R.M. LODHA, H.L. GOKHALE Date of Judgement: 11/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
50
|
THOTI MANOHAR Vs. STATE
OF A.P.
Coram: B.S. CHAUHAN, DIPAK MISRA Date of Judgement: 15/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
51
|
HUIDROM KONUNGJAO SINGH
Vs. STATE OF MANIPUR & ORS.
Coram: B.S. CHAUHAN, DIPAK MISRA Date of Judgement: 17/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
52
|
AMAR PAL SINGH Vs.
STATE OF U.P.& ANR.
Coram: B.S. CHAUHAN, DIPAK MISRA Date of Judgement: 17/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
53
|
STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs.
VINOD KUMAR
Coram: B.S. CHAUHAN, DIPAK MISRA Date of Judgement: 18/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
54
|
STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs.
DARSHAN SINGH @ DARSHAN LAL
Coram: B.S. CHAUHAN, DIPAK MISRA Date of Judgement: 21/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
55
|
RAMESH HARIJAN Vs.
STATE OF U.P.
Coram: B.S. CHAUHAN, DIPAK MISRA Date of Judgement: 21/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
56
|
UNION OF INDIA &
ORS. Vs. S. SRINIVASAN
Coram: B.S. CHAUHAN, DIPAK MISRA Date of Judgement: 21/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
57
|
ROHTASH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
Coram: B.S. CHAUHAN, DIPAK MISRA Date of Judgement: 22/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
58
|
BADAMI(D) TR.HER LR.
Vs. BHALI
Coram: B.S. CHAUHAN, DIPAK MISRA Date of Judgement: 22/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
59
|
UNION OF INDIA &
ANR. Vs. SHASHANK GOSWAMI & ANR.
Coram: B.S. CHAUHAN, DIPAK MISRA Date of Judgement: 23/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
60
|
NARENDER KUMAR Vs.
STATE(N.C.T.OF DELHI)
Coram: B.S. CHAUHAN, DIPAK MISRA Date of Judgement: 25/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
61
|
MUKUT BIHARI & ANR.
Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Coram: B.S. CHAUHAN, DIPAK MISRA Date of Judgement: 25/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
62
|
VIJAY KUMAR KAUL &
ORS. Vs. U.O.I. & ORS.
Coram: B.S. CHAUHAN, DIPAK MISRA Date of Judgement: 25/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
63
|
STATE OF UTTARKHAND
& ANR Vs. UMAKANT JOSHI
Coram: G.S. SINGHVI, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA Date of Judgement: 28/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
64
|
JUGENDRA SINGH Vs.
STATE OF U.P.
Coram: B.S. CHAUHAN, DIPAK MISRA Date of Judgement: 29/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
65
|
NARENDRA CHAMPAKLAL
TRIVEDI Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT
Coram: B.S. CHAUHAN, DIPAK MISRA Date of Judgement: 29/05/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
JUNE 2012
|
Sl
No.
|
Title
|
||
|
1
|
NUPUR TALWAR Vs. CBI
& ANR
Coram: A.K. PATNAIK, JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR Date of Judgement: 41067 Subject: Head Note: |
JULY 2012
|
Sl
No.
|
Title
|
||
|
1
|
ARVINDKUMAR ANUPALAL
PODDAR Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Coram: SWATANTER KUMAR, FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA Date of Judgement: 26/07/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
2
|
MONNET ISPAT AND ENERGY
LTD. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Coram: R.M. LODHA, H.L. GOKHALE Date of Judgement: 26/07/2012 Subject:CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950: Art.294, First Schedule - State Government's ownership in mines and minerals within its territory - Held: Erstwhile State of Bihar being a part-A State specified in First Schedule and prior thereto the Province of B Head Note:Dismissing the appeals, the Court HELD: (Per R. M. Lodha, J.) 1.1 In the Constitution of India, 1950, management of mineral resources has been left with both the Central Government and State Governments in terms of Entry 54 in List I and Ent |
||
|
3
|
BUDHADEV KARMASKAR Vs.
STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Coram: ALTAMAS KABIR, GYAN SUDHA MISRA Date of Judgement: 26/07/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
4
|
VINOD @ AJAY Vs. STATE
OF M.P.
Coram: H.L. DATTU, CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD Date of Judgement: 27/07/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
5
|
SANDEEP BISAMBHARLAL
KEDIA Vs. INDIABULLS FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.& ORS
Coram: H.L. DATTU, CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD Date of Judgement: 27/07/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
6
|
RESEARCH FOUNDN. FOR
SCIENCE Vs. U O I & ANR.
Coram: ALTAMAS KABIR, J. CHELAMESWAR Date of Judgement: 30/07/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
7
|
JAINENDRA SINGH Vs.
STATE OF U.P.TR.PRINL.SEC.HOME & ORS.
Coram: T.S. THAKUR, FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA Date of Judgement: 30/07/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
8
|
COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR
COMPANY Vs. DIRECTOR OF I.T BANGALORE
Coram: , A.K. PATNAIK, SWATANTER KUMAR Date of Judgement: 30/07/2012 Subject:Income Tax Act, 1961 - Chapter XIX-B; Sections 245N(a) and 245S - Authority for Advance Rulings (Income Tax) - Whether an advance ruling pronounced by the Authority can be challenged u/Article 226/227 of the Constitution before the High Court or u Head Note:Held: The Authority is a body exercising judicial power conferred on it by Chapter XIX-B of the Act and is a tribunal within the meaning of the expression in Articles 136 and 227 of the Constitution - Sub-section (1) of s.245S of the Act, insofar |
||
|
9
|
GANESH SHIVRAMJI MEHARE
& ANR Vs. MANGESH VASANTRAO DESHPANDE & ANR
Coram: H.L. DATTU, CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD Date of Judgement: 30/07/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
10
|
COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.&
CUSTOMS,BHOPAL Vs. M/S JAIN BROTHERS & ANR.
Coram: H.L. DATTU, CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD Date of Judgement: 30/07/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
11
|
KRISHNAPPA & ORS.
Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY BABALESHWARA P.S.
Coram: H.L. DATTU, CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD Date of Judgement: 31/07/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
12
|
SYED AHMED Vs. STATE OF
KARNATAKA
Coram: A.K. PATNAIK, MADAN B. LOKUR Date of Judgement: 31/07/2012 Subject:Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - ss.7 & 13(1)(d) r/w s.13(2) - Offences under - Prosecution case that appellant- a police official, demanded and accepted illegal gratification from PW1 for inquiring into a complaint lodged by him against his n Head Note:Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD:1.1. The inquiry by the Trial Judge ought to have been somewhat limited and confined to the question of a demand for illegal gratification by appellant, meeting that demand by PW1 and acceptance of the illeg |
||
|
13
|
ORIENTAL INSURANCE
CO.LTD. Vs. SIBY GEORGE & ORS.
Coram: AFTAB ALAM, RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI Date of Judgement: 31/07/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
14
|
JAYANTI KUMARI NAYAK
Vs. STATE OF ORISSA & ORS.
Coram: AFTAB ALAM, RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI Date of Judgement: 31/07/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
15
|
KASHINATH MONDAL Vs.
STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Coram: SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI Date of Judgement: 31/07/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
16
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
17
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
18
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
19
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
20
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
21
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
22
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
23
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
24
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
25
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
26
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
27
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
28
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
29
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
30
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
31
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
32
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
33
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
34
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
35
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
36
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
37
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
38
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
39
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
40
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
41
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
42
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
43
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
44
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
45
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
46
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
47
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
48
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
49
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
50
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
51
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
52
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
53
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
54
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
55
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
56
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
57
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
58
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
59
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
60
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
61
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
62
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
63
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
64
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
65
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
66
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
67
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
68
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
69
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
70
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
71
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
72
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
73
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
74
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
75
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
76
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
77
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
78
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
79
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
80
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
81
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
82
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
83
|
Date of Judgement: Subject: Head Note: |
AUGUST 2012
|
Sl No.
|
Title
|
||
|
1
|
M/S. OPTIEMUS INFRACOM
LTD. Vs. M/S. ISHAN SYSTEMS PVT.LTD. & ANR.
Coram: ALTAMAS KABIR, J. CHELAMESWAR Date of Judgement: 01/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
2
|
DR.MEHMOOD NAYYAR AZAM
Vs. STATE OF CHATTISGARH AND ORS
Coram: K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, DIPAK MISRA Date of Judgement: 03/08/2012 Subject:Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 21 - Right to life - Custodial torture - Compensation for - Appellant-doctor arrested in respect of alleged criminal offences and sent to police custody - Self-humiliating words were written on a placard and t Head Note:Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD:1.1. The reverence of life is insegragably associated with the dignity of a human being who is basically divine, not servile. The spark of life gets more resplendent when man is treated with dignity sans humil |
||
|
3
|
BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA
Vs. UNION OF INDIA
Coram: R.M. LODHA, ANIL R. DAVE Date of Judgement: 03/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
4
|
SATYABRATA SAHOO &
ORS. Vs. STATE OF ORISSA & ORS.
Coram: K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, DIPAK MISRA Date of Judgement: 03/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
5
|
AVISHEK GOENKA Vs.
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Coram: A.K. PATNAIK, SWATANTER KUMAR Date of Judgement: 03/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
6
|
STATE TR.P.S.LODHI
COLONY,NEW DELHI Vs. SANJEEV NANDA
Coram: DEEPAK VERMA, K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN Date of Judgement: 03/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
7
|
DAYAL SINGH & ORS.
Vs. STATE OF UTTARANCHAL
Coram: SWATANTER KUMAR, FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA Date of Judgement: 03/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
8
|
SADHUPATI NAGESWARA RAO
Vs. STATE OF A.P.
Coram: P. SATHASIVAM, RANJAN GOGOI Date of Judgement: 03/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
9
|
ASSIT. COMMERCIAL TAXES
OFFICER Vs. M/S. G.D. PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
Coram: H.L. DATTU, CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD Date of Judgement: 06/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
10
|
NARESH KUMAR Vs. STATE
OF HARYANA & ANR.
Coram: H.L. DATTU, CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD Date of Judgement: 06/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
11
|
CICILY KALLARACKAL Vs.
VEHICLE FACTORY
Coram: B.S. CHAUHAN, SWATANTER KUMAR Date of Judgement: 06/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
12
|
MUNNA LAL KAROSIA Vs.
STATE OF M.P. & ORS.
Coram: SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, H.L. GOKHALE Date of Judgement: 06/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
13
|
RAI SANDEEP @ DEEPU Vs.
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
Coram: SWATANTER KUMAR, FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA Date of Judgement: 07/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
14
|
RATTAN LAL (D) THR.LRS.
Vs. S.N.BHALLA & ORS.
Coram: ALTAMAS KABIR, J. CHELAMESWAR Date of Judgement: 08/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
15
|
R.C. CHANDEL Vs. HIGH
COURT OF M.P. & ANR.
Coram: R.M. LODHA, ANIL R. DAVE Date of Judgement: 08/08/2012 Subject:Service Law - Judicial Service - Compulsory retirement - Of appellant- judicial officer after 25 years in judicial service - Challenge to - Scope of judicial review - Held: On facts, it cannot be said that the recommendation made by the Full Court Head Note:Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD:1.1. Rule 56(2) of the Fundamental Rules provides that a government servant (read judicial officer) may, in the public interest, be retired at any time after he has completed 20 years' qualifying service, or |
||
|
16
|
STATE OF A.P. &
ORS. Vs. D. RAGHUKUL PERSHAD (D) BY LRS & ORS.
Coram: A.K. PATNAIK, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA Date of Judgement: 08/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
17
|
RAM SHIROMAN MISHRA Vs.
VISHWANATH PANDEY
Coram: AFTAB ALAM, RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI Date of Judgement: 08/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
18
|
BHOPAL GAS PEEDITH
MAHILA U.SANGAT.&ORS Vs. U.O.I. & ORS
Coram: S.H. KAPADIA, A.K. PATNAIK, SWATANTER KUMAR Date of Judgement: 09/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
19
|
RAJOO @ RAMAKANT Vs.
STATE OF M.P.
Coram: A.K. PATNAIK, MADAN B. LOKUR Date of Judgement: 09/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
20
|
KAVITA SOLUNKE Vs.
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
Coram: T.S. THAKUR, FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA Date of Judgement: 09/08/2012 Subject:Service Law - Appointment in Scheduled Tribe category - Protection of continuance in service - Entitlement to - Appointment of appellant in an aided school in Maharashtra against a reserved post of teacher meant for Scheduled Tribe candidates - Ap Head Note:Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD:1.1. In Milind's case, the Constitution Bench of this Court was examining whether Koshti was a sub-tribe within the meaning of Halba/Halbi as appearing in the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950. T |
||
|
21
|
SAEED ZAKIR HUSSAIN
MALIK Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
Coram: P. SATHASIVAM, RANJAN GOGOI Date of Judgement: 09/08/2012 Subject:CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 Art.22(5)-Preventive detention-Delay of 14+ months in executing the order of detention and also a delay of 15 months in making the order of detention-Held: Delay at both stages has to be explained and the court is Head Note:Allowing the appeal the Court HELD: 1.1. In view of clause (5) of Art.22 of the Constitution of India, it is incumbent on the detaining authority as well as the executing authority to serve the detention order at the earliest point of time. |
||
|
22
|
PHOOL KUMARI Vs. OFFICE
OF SUPDNT.CENT.JAIL,TIHAR & ANR.
Coram: P. SATHASIVAM, RANJAN GOGOI Date of Judgement: 09/08/2012 Subject:Prisoners: Employment of - Payment of wages - Conviction of appellant u/ss.323, 342, 307 read with s.34, IPC and rigorous imprisonment (RI) for 10 years - Sentence reduced by High Court to 5 years - Appellant remaining in jail from 24.03.2007 to Head Note:On appeal, held: It was definite case of jail authorities that for the work done, the appellant-convict was paid wages as per the circulars/orders applicable to her and in this regard ledger containing her signatures was produced - Contra stand of |
||
|
23
|
CANTONMENT BOARD JAMMU
& ORS. Vs. JAGAT PAL SINGH CHEMMA
Coram: P. SATHASIVAM, RANJAN GOGOI Date of Judgement: 09/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
24
|
RAJU JHURANI Vs. M/S.
GERMINDA PVT. LTD.
Coram: ALTAMAS KABIR, J. CHELAMESWAR Date of Judgement: 16/08/2012 Subject:COMPANIES ACT, 1956: ss. 433, 434 and 439 - Petition for winding-up of the tenant company filed by land-lord for non-payment of arrears of rent due - Rejected by High Court as barred by provisions of O.2, r.2 CPC - Held: Order 2, CPC deals with Head Note:Allowing the appeal in part, the Court HELD: 1.1 Order 2, CPC deals with the frame of suits, and the various rules contained therein also refer to suits for obtaining the reliefs of a civil nature. On the other hand, proceeding u/ss 433, 43 |
||
|
25
|
VICE CHANCELLOR GURU
GHASIDAS UNIVERSITY Vs. CRAIG MACLEOD
Coram: A.K. PATNAIK, MADAN B. LOKUR Date of Judgement: 16/08/2012 Subject:CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950: Art. 136 - Interference with interim order passed by High Court staying operation of orders of the University against a student charged with beating and threatening a teacher - Held: There is a self-imposed limited Head Note:Disposing of the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 It is only in an atypical case that this Court entertains a petition against a discretionary interim order passed by the High Court where repercussions are grave or the legal basis for passing the |
||
|
26
|
PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING
& DEV.AUTH.& ORS. Vs. RAGHU NATH GUPTA & ORS.
Coram: K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, MADAN B. LOKUR Date of Judgement: 16/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
27
|
PATHAN HUSSAIN BASHA
Vs. STATE OF A.P.
Coram: SWATANTER KUMAR, FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA Date of Judgement: 16/08/2012 Subject:Penal Code, 1860 - ss.304-B and 498-A - Suicide by married woman - Short span of time between marriage and death of the deceased - Prosecution case that deceased was being harassed and ill-treated by her husband, father-in- law and mother-in-law f Head Note:Partly allowing the appeals, the Court HELD:1. From the evidence, it is clear that the dowry demands were being raised by the accused persons persistently from the family of the deceased and for that they even harassed the deceased, by beating a |
||
|
28
|
RAVI KAPUR Vs. STATE OF
RAJASTHAN
Coram: SWATANTER KUMAR, FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA Date of Judgement: 16/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
29
|
SUPREME COURT BAR
ASSOCIATION & ORS. Vs. B.D. KAUSHIK
Coram: ALTAMAS KABIR, J. CHELAMESWAR Date of Judgement: 16/08/2012 Subject:BAR ASSOCIATION: Supreme Court Bar Association - Eligibility of Members to contest and vote at the election to Executive Committee - "ONE BAR ONE VOTE" principle - Applicability of - Order of Supreme Court dated 20.7.2012 - Modified to the eff Head Note: |
||
|
30
|
RANJAN DWIVEDI Vs.
C.B.I TR.DIRECTOR GENERAL
Coram: H.L. DATTU, CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD Date of Judgement: 17/08/2012 Subject:CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950: Art. 21 - Speedy trial - Samastipur bomb-blast - 37 years delay in trial - Held: The Constitution does not expressly declare the right to speedy trial as a fundamental right - However, `reasonably' expeditious trial Head Note:Dismissing the writ petitions, the Court HELD: (Per H.L. Dattu, J) 1.1 In Abdul Rehman Antulay, Kartar Singh and P. Ramchandra Rao*, this Court has laid down guidelines as regards the right to speedy trial. The Constitution of India does not |
||
|
31
|
CHANDI PRASAD UNIYAL
AND ORS Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ORS
Coram: K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, DIPAK MISRA Date of Judgement: 17/08/2012 Subject:Service Law - Pay scale - Fixation of pay scale based on 5th Pay Commission Report - Excess payment made due to wrong/irregular pay fixation - Recovery of - Permissibility - Whether over-payment of amount due to wrong fixation of 5th and 6th pay s Head Note:Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD:1.1. When the revised pay scale/pay fixation was fixed on the basis of the 5th Central Pay Scale, a condition was superimposed that in the case of irregular/wrong pay fixation, the institution shall be respo |
||
|
32
|
STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs.
RAJKUMAR AGARWAL & ANR.
Coram: AFTAB ALAM, RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI Date of Judgement: 17/08/2012 Subject:CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973: s.482 - Exercise of power by High Court to quash criminal proceedings - Explained. s.482 - High Court quashing the FIR registered against the respondent, a Surgeon in Govt. Hospital, for accepting illegal gra Head Note:Allowing the appeal of the State, the Court HELD: 1.1 According to the prosecution, the trap was successful. The chemically treated currency notes for the purpose of trap were found with respondent 1 and the test of his hand was found positi |
||
|
33
|
K. VENKATESHWARLU Vs.
STATE OF A.P.
Coram: AFTAB ALAM, RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI Date of Judgement: 17/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
34
|
KALU @ AMIT Vs. STATE
OF HARYANA
Coram: AFTAB ALAM, RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI Date of Judgement: 17/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
35
|
SUBHASH KRISHNAN Vs.
STATE OF GOA
Coram: SWATANTER KUMAR, FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA Date of Judgement: 17/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
36
|
M/S MICHIGAN RUBBER(I) LTD.
Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.
Coram: P. SATHASIVAM, RANJAN GOGOI Date of Judgement: 17/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
37
|
VIDUR IMPEX &
TRADERS PVT.LTD.& ORS. Vs. TOSH APARTMENTS PVT.LTD.& ORS.
Coram: G.S. SINGHVI, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA Date of Judgement: 21/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
38
|
PEOPLE'S UNIVERSITY Vs.
STATE OF M.P. & ANR.
Coram: G.S. SINGHVI, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA Date of Judgement: 21/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
39
|
STATE OF U.P. Vs.
SANJAY KUMAR
Coram: B.S. CHAUHAN, SWATANTER KUMAR Date of Judgement: 21/08/2012 Subject:PENAL CODE, 1860: ss. 302 and 376 - Rape and murder of an eighteen year old girl - Death sentence - Commuted by High Court to life imprisonment - SENTENCE/SENTENCING: Sentencing policy - Principle of proportionality - Aggravating and mitig Head Note:Held: High Court is correct to the extent that the facts of the case did not warrant death sentence. Neel Kumar @ Anil Kumar v. State of Haryana, (2012) 5 SCC 766; and Sandeep v. State of U.P. (2012) 6 SCC 107; Ramraj v. State of Chhattisgarh |
||
|
40
|
GHANSHYAM DAS GUPTA Vs.
MAKHAN LAL
Coram: K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, DIPAK MISRA Date of Judgement: 21/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
41
|
DEVINDER SINGH NARULA
Vs. MEENAKSHI NANGIA
Coram: ALTAMAS KABIR, J. CHELAMESWAR Date of Judgement: 22/08/2012 Subject:CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950: Art. 142 read with Art. 136 - Exercise of jurisdiction to dissolve the marriage before the cooling off period, on a petition for divorce by mutual consent u/s 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Held: It is no doubt Head Note:Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 itself provides for a cooling off period of six months on the first motion being moved, in the event the parties changed their minds during the said period. |
||
|
42
|
STATE OF HARYANA &
ORS. Vs. VIJAY SINGH & ORS.
Coram: G.S. SINGHVI, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA Date of Judgement: 22/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
43
|
KAVITA Vs. DEEPAK AND
ORS.
Coram: G.S. SINGHVI, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA Date of Judgement: 22/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
44
|
R.S. MISRA Vs. UNION OF
INDIA AND ORS.
Coram: G.S. SINGHVI, FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA Date of Judgement: 22/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
45
|
SRINIVASA SURTANARAYANA
MURTHY Vs. KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD
Coram: G.S. SINGHVI, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA Date of Judgement: 22/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
46
|
REBEKA MINZ & ORS.
Vs. DIV. MANAGER U.I.I. CO. LTD. & ORS.
Coram: G.S. SINGHVI, FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA Date of Judgement: 23/08/2012 Subject:Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Accidental death - Quantum of compensation - Appropriate multiplier - Rate of interest payable - Held: Since the deceased was stated to be 35 years old at the time of his death, the multiplier would be 16 which has to be Head Note:Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD:1. The impugned order of the High Court being a non-speaking order calls for interference. [Para 3] 2.1. Since the deceased was stated to be 35 years old at the time of his death, the multiplier would be |
||
|
47
|
THE REGISTRAR, RAJIV
GANDHI UNIVERSITY Vs. G. HEMLATHA AND ORS
Coram: A.K. PATNAIK, RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI Date of Judgement: 23/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
48
|
SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY Vs.
A.RAJA
Coram: G.S. SINGHVI, K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN Date of Judgement: 24/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
49
|
KANPUR
DEVT.AUTH.TR.VICE CHAIRMAN Vs. SHEO PRAKASH GUPTA & ANR
Coram: G.S. SINGHVI, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA Date of Judgement: 24/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
50
|
I.T.C. LTD. Vs. ADARSH
COOP. HOUSING SOC. LTD.
Coram: P. SATHASIVAM, RANJAN GOGOI Date of Judgement: 27/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
51
|
POOJA RANA Vs. STATE OF
HARYANA AND ORS.
Coram: B.S. CHAUHAN, JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR Date of Judgement: 27/08/2012 Subject:Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 32 - Writ petition - Petitioner had married a person out of her free will - However, her parents and maternal uncle had registered a criminal case against her husband - Prayer of petitioner for quashing FIR a Head Note:Held: It is not the case of the petitioner that she had made any attempt to get the copy of the FIR and it was not made available to her - Nor there is any statement in her petition that she tried to lodge FIR against her parents and uncle but it |
||
|
52
|
LABH SINGH Vs.
P.K.CHAUDHARY CHIEF SEC.GOV.OF HAR.& ORS
Coram: H.L. DATTU, CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD Date of Judgement: 27/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
53
|
NARAYAN MANIKRAO SALGAR
Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Coram: SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, H.L. GOKHALE Date of Judgement: 28/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
54
|
MANGAL AMUSEMENT
PARK(P) LTD.& ANR Vs. STATE OF M.P.& ORS.
Coram: SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, H.L. GOKHALE Date of Judgement: 28/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
55
|
SALAUDDIN AHMED &
ANR. Vs. SAMTA ANDOLAN
Coram: ALTAMAS KABIR, J. CHELAMESWAR Date of Judgement: 29/08/2012 Subject:CONTEMPT OF COURT: Contempt of court - Ingredients - Explained. Contempt petition - High Court holding the State authorities guilty of contempt of court for non-compliance of order of Division Bench of the High Court - Held: The explanation g Head Note:Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1.1 In order to establish that a person had deliberately and willfully committed contempt of court, two essential ingredients have to be proved: Firstly, it has to be established that an order has been pa |
||
|
56
|
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL
EXCISE, MUMBAI Vs. M/S. FIAT INDIA (P) LTD. & ANR.
Coram: H.L. DATTU, ANIL R. DAVE Date of Judgement: 29/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
57
|
STATE OF M.P. Vs. AYUB
KHAN
Coram: K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, DIPAK MISRA Date of Judgement: 29/08/2012 Subject:ARMS ACT, 1959: s.25(1)(a) - Unauthorised possession of arms - Punishment - Held: Proliferation of arms and ammunition, whether licensed or not, in the country disrupts the social order and development, vitiates law and order situation, directl Head Note:Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. Proliferation of arms and ammunition, whether licensed or not, in the country disrupts the social order and development, vitiates law and order situation, directly contributes towards lethality of viole |
||
|
58
|
GURU BASAVARAJ @ BENNE
SETTAPPA Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA
Coram: K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, DIPAK MISRA Date of Judgement: 29/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
59
|
MD.AJMAL MD.AMIR KASAB
@ABU MAJAHID Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Coram: AFTAB ALAM, CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD Date of Judgement: 29/08/2012 Subject:PENAL CODE, 1860: ss. 302, 302 read with s.34 and s.302 read with ss.109, 120-B,121, 121-A and 122 IPC and s.16 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - 26/11 (2008) terrorists' attack on Mumbai at targeted places by appellant (A-1) alon Head Note:Dismissing the appeals, the Court HELD: (Per Aftab Alam, J) 1.1 In regard to the CST episode, like all other parts of the case, the prosecution has gathered a very large amount of evidence: ocular, forensic and of other kinds, e.g., CCTV reco |
||
|
60
|
VIJAY SINGH Vs. STATE
OF DELHI
Coram: T.S. THAKUR, FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA Date of Judgement: 29/08/2012 Subject:Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000 [as amended] - ss. 2(k), 2(l), 7A, 20 and 49 - Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2007 - rr.12 and 98 - Appellant allegedly gave knife blows on the person of PW-4 - Head Note:Partly allowing the appeal, the Court HELD:1. Having regard to the overwhelming evidence led before the trial Court and on being convinced of the proof of guilt against the appellant, the appellant was convicted for the offence under Section 307 |
||
|
61
|
PATASI DEVI Vs. STATE
OF HARYANA & ORS.
Coram: G.S. SINGHVI, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA Date of Judgement: 29/08/2012 Subject:Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - ss.4 and 6 - Acquisition of land - Award passed on 9.12.2009 - Acquired land included land of the appellant - Writ petition by appellant challenging the acquisition of her land on the ground that in the garb of acquiri Head Note:On appeal, held: The High Court was not right in holding that the writ petition of the appellant was not maintainable because the same was filed after passing of the award - Respondent Nos.1 to 3 failed to discharge the onus to prove that after pa |
||
|
62
|
KRISHI UPAJ MANDI
SAMITI, NARSINGHPUR Vs. M/S. SHIV SHAKTI KHANSARI UDYOG & ORS.
Coram: G.S. SINGHVI, H.L. DATTU Date of Judgement: 30/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
63
|
RAJAN PUROHIT &
ORS. Vs. RAJ.UNIV.OF HEALTH SCIENCE & ORS.
Coram: A.K. PATNAIK, SWATANTER KUMAR Date of Judgement: 30/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
64
|
SAHARA INDIA REAL
ESTATE CORP.LTD.& ORS Vs. SECURITIES & EXCH.BOARD OF INDIA & ANR
Coram: K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR Date of Judgement: 31/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
65
|
LAVESH Vs. STATE (NCT
OF DELHI)
Coram: P. SATHASIVAM, RANJAN GOGOI Date of Judgement: 31/08/2012 Subject:CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973: s.438 read with s.82 - Application for anticipatory bail by an accused declared as "proclaimed offender" in a case of dowry death - Held: Normally, court should not exercise its discretion to grant anticipatory Head Note:Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 While considering the request for anticipatory bail in terms of s.438 CrPC, the court has to take into consideration the nature and the gravity of the accusation, antecedents, possibility of the appl |
||
|
66
|
MOHD. HUSSAIN @
JULFIKAR ALI Vs. THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI
Coram: R.M. LODHA, ANIL R. DAVE, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA Date of Judgement: 31/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
67
|
M.C.GUPTA Vs. C.B.I
Coram: AFTAB ALAM, RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI Date of Judgement: 31/08/2012 Subject:PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1988: s. 30(2) of 1988 Act read with s.6 of General Clauses Act, 1897 - Saving of investigation under the repealed Act - Offence committed while 1947 Act was in force - FIR registered for offences punishable under t Head Note:Disposing of the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 Sub-s. (2) of s. 30 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (New Act) says that anything done or any action taken or purported to have been done or taken under or in pursuance of the repealed A |
||
|
68
|
STATE OF N.C.T.OF DELHI
Vs. AJAY KUMAR TYAGI
Coram: R.M. LODHA, CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA Date of Judgement: 31/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
||
|
69
|
KAILASH SINGH &
ANR. Vs. STATE OF BIHAR & ANR.
Coram: SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, H.L. GOKHALE Date of Judgement: 31/08/2012 Subject: Head Note: |
No comments:
Post a Comment